> >> I'm missing something. If the term "virus" doesn't have a value
> >> associated with it (as Dawkin's term obviously does) doesn't it
> >> become somewhat redundant? Why not just use the term "idea"...
> >>
> >The point is how it spreads. Memes and viruses (both/all/the
> >only sort, take your pick) spread by replication.
>
> And ideas spread by sexual contact :-)
>
> Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
> tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159
There are definitely some ideas I like to spread!
The Nateman