This discussion reminds me of the Absolute truth argument. While
I feel that Alex and comrads make excellent points regarding the
impossibility of fully encoding a meme (as it exists in one's
head), I think it is simply more useful to retain the current
definition of a meme and include careful explanations concerning
what they point out when necessary. The alternative is to be
forced to use cumbersome and ineffecient terminology. Alex's
heresy isn't really that controversial at it's heart. Once the
point is made, I don't think many people will discount it.
If "meme" is intended to be analogous with "gene", then David's
definition is prefered because, as has been pointed out, genes
are subject to misinterpretation and encoding/decoding errors just
as memes are. There is a question of degree of transmission
imperfection, but this is a quantitative distiction, not
qualitative.
Jason
---------------------------------------------------------------
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy University of Calgary
jmcvean@acs.ucalgary.ca http://www.ucalgary.ca/~jmcvean
"All my life I've been waiting, and watching, and waiting for
flesh that smells familiar." Sara Craig - Thank You (Very Much)
---------------------------------------------------------------