This is to say: "Will" further suggests that the potential to act is contained as a type of energy within *B*eings (As a life force?). Using the will, then, a Being may direct this force (ex. through *work*). The question becomes: "If 'will' implies the personal use of energy to accomplish an action; then, does this suggest that the action taken is opposed to a larger intentionality?" (ex. A person uses some effort to push a ball uphill. Doesn't this suggest that the person who "wills" that the ball move uphill must also use force in a way which is opposed to the natural intent... of the ball? ... of the person who wills?).
I say that will is ALWAYS opposed to intent; thus, it originates from-- and, ultimately, "benefits"-- only the individual who wills. However, this understanding also suggests that force is always required by the one who wills. Thus, the human-- as a self-contained "system"-- must eventually use his own energy to affect all changes whereby reality might conform to will. Such individuals thereby deplete their reserve of energy-- and so deplete their life-force (the force contained by the system is eventually re-directed to the flow from which it originated).
As such, I assume that will is allowed through "contingency" (or
"grace") and that the intentionality exemplified by cause-and-effect
eventually directs it toward a necessary end (or else intent must
override will-- to the detriment of the system whose energies are not
aligned with this intent.., even, or especially, those systems which
might be entirely self-contained and [incorrectly] presumed to be "self"
sustainable).
Brett Lane Robertson
Indiana, USA
http://www.window.to/mindrec
MindRecreation Metaphysical Assn.
BIO: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay
...........
Put your item up for auction! Bid on hot opportunities! Click HERE to
view great deals!:
http://www.utrade.com/index.htm?MID=59876