How can I not laugh of that?? Its truly funny and from my own response, justified.
Bill Roh
iNTj
KMO wrote:
> I've recently joined an INFJ list. It's HIGH traffic, and I doubt I'll
> be able to stay on it long, but it does provide a very interesting set
> of subjects for observation as the post below illustrates.
>
> -KMO
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Behavior on the list (was Re: Gender mixups)
> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:49:31 -0500
> From: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
> Reply-To: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
> To: Jen <jen@ains.net.au>, chase <chase@home.com>
> CC: "P. Prentice" <p.prentice@mailbox.uq.edu.au>, infj-l@halisp.net
> References:
> <2af46d8e.36f99c9e@aol.com><36F99E78.2855CB77@ains.net.au><36F9DC78.29C91261@home.com><4.1.19990325130107.00aba5e0@192.92.110.1><36FAC433.C664141E@mailbox.uq.edu.au><36FB9AC6.C51FF7B8@home.com>
>
> Really from: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
> At 01:30 AM 3/27/99 +1100, Jen wrote:
> >Really from: Jen <jen@ains.net.au>
> >
> >
> >chase wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This is our list - if we all leave because of a few infiltrators, then
> >what? Bill
> >> could easily get rid of them...
> >
> >You are kidding, right?
>
> Disclaimer: All of this is MY opinion. I speak only for me and what I
> feel.
>
> This IS a list for INFJ's. If some INTJ's want to LISTEN and not
> attack/nitpick/insult the other posters, that's fine. But that is not
> what
> is going on.
>
> For the past few months, the list has become MUCH more esoteric,
> nitpicky
> and combative than it EVER was in the past. This is NOT what the list
> is
> about--it is primarily for INFJ's to find a haven of mutual
> understanding
> and respect which is SO difficult to find in the real world.
>
> If it serves other purposes, that's great. But if implementing the
> other
> purposes overrides the primary purpose of this list, they MUST be put
> aside, so the list can serve INFJ's.
>
> To put it bluntly: If someone cannot treat other members of the list
> in a
> cooperative, respectful, understanding manner, even when disagreeing
> with
> someone, that person does NOT BELONG ON THIS LIST.
>
> INTJ's have their own lists and I'm SURE they would resent if a horde
> of
> NF's joined their list and insisted they "be more compassionate, less
> brutal." or otherwise interjected unwanted emotions, attempts at
> "conciliation", hyperbole and such into their discussions. It would be
> like throwing a wrench into their group and they would have a RIGHT to
> eject the NF's to maintain the group's flavor.
>
> If someone can understand and honor the mode of conduct on the list,
> that's fine and I support their attempts at understanding us. However,
> if
> they can't understand or won't honor that mode, they should NOT be here.
>
> Sort of like how being invited as a guest to someone's house means YOU
> ABIDE BY THEIR RULES. If they invite you in to have tea, you can have
> tea,
> but you CANNOT repaint the house, move the furniture and harass the
> other
> guests. If you did, you WOULD be ejected and you would deserve it.
>
> And, frankly Jen, if living by an emotional code of ethics upsets you,
> go
> to the INTJ lists and do NOT come back.