I've recently joined an INFJ list. It's HIGH traffic, and I doubt I'll
be able to stay on it long, but it does provide a very interesting set
of subjects for observation as the post below illustrates.
-KMO
Really from: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
At 01:30 AM 3/27/99 +1100, Jen wrote:
Disclaimer: All of this is MY opinion. I speak only for me and what I
feel.
This IS a list for INFJ's. If some INTJ's want to LISTEN and not
attack/nitpick/insult the other posters, that's fine. But that is not
what
For the past few months, the list has become MUCH more esoteric,
nitpicky
If it serves other purposes, that's great. But if implementing the
other
To put it bluntly: If someone cannot treat other members of the list
in a
INTJ's have their own lists and I'm SURE they would resent if a horde
of
If someone can understand and honor the mode of conduct on the list,
that's fine and I support their attempts at understanding us. However,
if
Sort of like how being invited as a guest to someone's house means YOU
ABIDE BY THEIR RULES. If they invite you in to have tea, you can have
tea,
Subject: Behavior on the list (was Re: Gender mixups)
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 1999 09:49:31 -0500
From: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
Reply-To: Chris Petit <bluemist1@home.com>
To: Jen <jen@ains.net.au>, chase <chase@home.com>
CC: "P. Prentice" <p.prentice@mailbox.uq.edu.au>, infj-l@halisp.net
References:
<2af46d8e.36f99c9e@aol.com><36F99E78.2855CB77@ains.net.au><36F9DC78.29C91261@home.com><4.1.19990325130107.00aba5e0@192.92.110.1><36FAC433.C664141E@mailbox.uq.edu.au><36FB9AC6.C51FF7B8@home.com>
>Really from: Jen <jen@ains.net.au>
>
>
>chase wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> This is our list - if we all leave because of a few infiltrators, then
>what? Bill
>> could easily get rid of them...
>
>You are kidding, right?
is going on.
and combative than it EVER was in the past. This is NOT what the list
is
about--it is primarily for INFJ's to find a haven of mutual
understanding
and respect which is SO difficult to find in the real world.
purposes overrides the primary purpose of this list, they MUST be put
aside, so the list can serve INFJ's.
cooperative, respectful, understanding manner, even when disagreeing
with
someone, that person does NOT BELONG ON THIS LIST.
NF's joined their list and insisted they "be more compassionate, less
brutal." or otherwise interjected unwanted emotions, attempts at
"conciliation", hyperbole and such into their discussions. It would be
like throwing a wrench into their group and they would have a RIGHT to
eject the NF's to maintain the group's flavor.
they can't understand or won't honor that mode, they should NOT be here.
but you CANNOT repaint the house, move the furniture and harass the
other
And, frankly Jen, if living by an emotional code of ethics upsets you,
go
to the INTJ lists and do NOT come back.