RE: RE: RE: RE: virus: materialism and other worldviews

Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 18:52:07 -0800

I can't imagine who would argue either that all worldviews are equally useful or that mental deficiency is advantageous.

Level 3 is more useful than Level 2 for certain purposes such as self-satisfaction, personal empowerment, and versatility of relationships.

Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/ Author, "Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme" http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm Free newsletter! Visit Meme Central at
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf Of joe dees
Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 5:53 PM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re:RE: RE: RE: virus: materialism and other worldviews

They cannot learn any philosophical or otherwise abstract concepts by reading them and only have the preachings of itinerant mullahs for any direction, so, U betcha! Their plight is the the result of their inability to think either abstractly or logically, and it really does encumber them, socially and technologically. Try reading the book; you, too, might still have something to learn about all worldviews not working equally well RW, especially mentally truncated ones.

At Fri, 19 Feb 1999 16:20:57 -0800, you wrote:
>
>And you blame lack of philosophy rather than illiteracy for their plight?
>
>Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/
>Author, "Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme"
>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm
>Free newsletter! Visit Meme Central at
>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com]On Behalf
>Of joe dees
>Sent: Friday, February 19, 1999 3:54 PM
>To: virus@lucifer.com
>Subject: Re:RE: RE: virus: materialism and other worldviews
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At Fri, 19 Feb 1999 08:19:43 -0800, you wrote:
>>
>>Joe Dees wrote:
>>
>><<When people attempt to not philosophize they only end up philosophizing
>>implicitly and poorly, whether they call their position an it an ist, an
>>ish, an ing or an ian.>>
>>
>>Do you have any evidence to back that claim? For instance, have you done
>any
>>studies, or do you know of any, that show that people with explicit
>rational
>>philosophies are more successful in any way than others? Or do you just
>take
>>it on faith that it's true?
>>
>>Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/
>>Author, "Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme"
>>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm
>>Free newsletter! Visit Meme Central at
>>http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm
>
>I refer you to COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT: ITS CULTURAL AND SOCIAL FOUNDATIONS
by
>A. R. Luria (a late professor of psychology at Moscow University), where
>illiterate Russian peasants were found to be frozen at the Piagetian level
>of concrete operations, unable to solve the most elementary abstract
>problems, and unable to think in terms of hypothetical scenarios, causing a
>massive deficit in both their ability to innovate and their ability to plan
>for changing circumstances, and a subsequent lower subsistence level and
>lifespan.
>Joe E. Dees
>Poet, Pagan, Philosopher
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time.
>Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today!
>http://webmail.bellsouth.net
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>
>
>

Joe E. Dees
Poet, Pagan, Philosopher



Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time. Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today! http://webmail.bellsouth.net