Wade wrote:
<<I have never been given a vicarious experience sufficient
to supply a living memory, or knowledge, about a thing or a feeling. I
have to be burnt to _know_ something is hot.
So, what _is_ this 'technique' of which you speak, and of which I have no
personal appreciation or knowledge, cannot practice, and have not been
subjected to? (Or at the very least, have no memory of and cannot draw
from?)>>
Nonsense. You know all about science without having performed all the
experiments.
The techniques people use to build up their self-confidence are support
groups, audio and video tapes, and so
<<And why do you think it works very well? Compared to what? >>
Lots of first- and second-hand experience. Compared to the "distinguish and discard" strategy that keeps us in Level 2.
<<If something has an analog with my own experiences, I know it. Otherwise,
it's just a story, and I forget it, or keep it in storage waiting for
comfirmation. But the confirmation must be a feeling that is within me. >>
No argument here. For me, it was just a matter of being open enough to reconsider some of my cherished beliefs.
<<Now, I'll admit right up front that I am, in perhaps all ways, saying
that I don't get it.>>
I acknowledge your honesty and vulnerabitity.
Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/
Author, "Virus of the Mind: The New Science of the Meme"
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/votm.htm
Free newsletter! Visit Meme Central at
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm