Bob Hartwig wrote:
> >
> >That is the core of Level 3. If a theory or argument doesn't
> >agree with you and your purpose, then you don't have to obey
> >it!
> >
>
> So those of us who think the "Levels" are horse shit are on Level 3?
Or perhaps it's all a memetic strategy (propaganda) in an empire building exercise...
Deron Stewart wrote:
> Bill Roh wrote:
> <<
> This last note: I am not opposed, nor do I think the level system is crap.
> I
> simply think that this system cannot do justice to the multitude of ways in
> which people think and act.
> >>
>
> Exactly!
>
> That's because the <level system> is itself a Level 2 description -- a
> "map". And the whole point of Level 3 is that no single map can do proper
> justice to the multitude of ways which people think and act (or practically
> anything else).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Deron
Unless that one map (or model) happens to be multidimensional (with probability as one of the dimensions).
Craig
("I will not be filed, defiled, listed, unlisted, briefed or debriefed. I am
not a number, I am a free man" No.6)