Well, I more meant that the evidence- such as weeping statues, stigmata,
apparitions of the BVM, et al ad infinitum, are bogus- since that is the
only evidence upon which we may perform examination, and that such
'evidence' (most often fraud, actually) is presented as proof of deity.
Sorry for any confusion there.
If deities were _not_ bogus- now there's a supposition.... And that is
the thought experiment that _should_ be undertaken.
*****************
Wade T. Smith
morbius@channel1.com | "There ain't nothin' you
wade_smith@harvard.edu | shouldn't do to a god."
morbius@cyberwarped.com |
******* http://www.channel1.com/users/morbius/ *******