>As to context and content, I gave the example of dissimination of
>information (the "context of information" without respect to special
>interest groups (without respect to "content"). Another example of
>complexity at the level of government which focuses on issues instead of
>special interest would be changing the *form* of the governmental
>structure--from division of church and state to a church-state, without
>regard to specific legal interests.
> And to follow up on this idea...I don't give a damn
>about redistribution of the wealth or grassroots support or have's and
>havenots as you are using them since your use is a fine example of
focusing
>on issues rather than context (and thereby my comment that you are
"preaching").
How can you separate context from content? Maybe you live on an ethereal
plane where content is insignificant details, while context is all that
matters.
--David R.