> > The main problem I have with your faith is that
> > keep claiming that you have "faith" and that you know what is true
> > and don't need to prove it.
> >
> > Then you spend 100+ lines trying to prove that to me.
> >
> > See?!?
> No, afraid I don't see.
Yeah, I noticed. "And seeing they do not see..."
> I think you do not understand the meaning of "faith."
It's coming closer to David's thanks to this interaction.
> But you did not make one comment on the 100 lines, Tim. I
> expected better of you. All you said was: I don't agree with you.
Why would attack the logical arguements you use to justify your "faith"?
If you can justify it it isn't faith, Cathy. You've acomplished little by
your leap of non-faith. Why do you call it "faith" if you can prove it?
> You suck your thumb, dah dah dah dah. Methinks you are projecting
> your own fears, your own thumbsucking, your own confusion by the
> whole situation.
Probably true. What do I know, after all?
-Prof. Tim