You did not read my old boring long quotes. In fact, most raw data
is NEVER open to scrutiny. Read the book.
4. Many of the tools are almost
> universally accepted (Quantum Physics, General relativity etc...) 5.
> Scientific spoofs are less likely to last very long as scrutiny is
> more viscious and the speed of communication makes lying very
> difficult. ( you don't see the anti-arthritis electrocution units
> about anymore)
>
These are hard sciences and are easier to deal with, plus these
theories go back 50 years.
> i would not accept any scientific theory that failed any test, and
> was not replicable by others - for or against the idea.
How would you know, most of them are not validated or replicated?
I think I've gotten an admission to that effect.
> Sodom
>