RE: virus: META: a rule for the list

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Tue, 14 Oct 1997 09:13:26 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: virus: what is a valid philosophy?"
Previous message: chardin: "Re: virus: Public education vs. freedom"

Richard wrote:
[David McF:]
>> It is not fair to accuse another of basing an argument on
>> a falsehood, then say that truth doesn't matter if accused
>> of the same. Notice I am explicitly not saying what the
>> standards should be, I'm only saying that there should at
>> least be some fairness in this game. Any objections?
>
>If you're talking about the Nametag affair, you're still wrong if you think
>I changed it.

Yes, you did. Computers are not considered alive and responsible yet. Try
again.

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159

Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: virus: what is a valid philosophy?"
Previous message: chardin: "Re: virus: Public education vs. freedom"