> At 12:48 PM 10/10/97 -0400, Sodom wrote:
>
> > Science is our own invention, and we use patterns to help our
> minds
> >grasp what we observe through science. But we cannot assume that
> those
> >patterns exist as outside entities, just that what we observe we is
> >probably accurate.
>
> Accurate compared to what?
>
>
> --
> David McFadzean david@lucifer.com
> Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
> Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/
Of course accurate is still relative, how bout reproducable.
Obviously all of our observation is filtered by our mind, and I believe
we are mostly unaware of the filtering. Reproducable is probably the
closest we can get to accurate.
Sodom