>
>
> Nathaniel Hall wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Nathaniel Hall wrote:
>>
>> > chardin wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Date: Tue, 07 Oct 1997 23:58:40 -0600
>> > > > From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
>> > > > To: virus@lucifer.com
>> > > > Subject: Re: virus:Logic
>> > > > Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Marie Foster wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I am going to risk it and sling in my thoughts about science
>> > -
>> > > > > religion. It seems to me that both are attempts to explain
>> > the
>> > > > > existence of the energy we seem to agree exists. How well or
>> > poorly
>> > > > > either does this has to do more with the power structure that
>> > uses ( or
>> > > > > misuses) the insights gained.
>> > > >
>> > > > Insights gained? One gets insight when one uses ones eyes to
>> > see (science)
>> > > > not when one shuts them (religion). Power structure? Who
>> > controls your
>> > > > thoughts when you choose to think freely? Who controls your
>> > thoughts when
>> > > > your a cult member?The Nateman, waiting for the inquisition.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Nateman, does the term " Pascal's Wager" mean anything to you?
>> >
>> > > If
>> > > you are right, I have no worries. From the primordial slime we
>> > came
>> > > and to the dust of the grave I shall return. If we are
>> > > right....you could be in biggg trouble!
>> > > Never mind that the Pope said there was a special place in hell
>> > for
>> > > Pascal. :)
>> >
>> > I could not have faith even if I wanted to. It's simply not in my
>> > nature. If you
>> > think I'm in big trouble check out this guy:
>> > http://members.iquest.net/~teevie/sagan.html
>>
>> Whoops! Screwed the link up . This is the fixed version on top.
>
> Egads! It was still bad.Third times a charm, I promise.Nateman.