Re: virus: political stuff

chardin (chardin@uabid.dom.uab.edu)
Wed, 8 Oct 1997 17:37:10 CST+6CDT

Nateman, I can't blame Aldrich. Aldrich admits it was "allegations
that need to be looked into." What I can't understand is why you
can't take the man at his own words. He tries to tell you he was
only fooling--trying to make a buck off a book and you refuse to
believe him. My, my. You must dislike Clinton pretttty badly.

I've been accused of a lot of things but rose-colored-glasses--that
is a new one for me. Do you think I don't believe most all
politicians are evil (Feingold and McCain may be exceptions--choke,
never thought I'd have good words for a Republican). Politicans are
necessary evils--I just try to choose the lesser of the two evils.

> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 15:53:24 -0600
> From: Nathaniel Hall <natehall@worldnet.att.net>
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: Re: virus: political stuff
> Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com

>
> --------------A9C7A738261B4AB2D870CEA3
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
>
>
> chardin wrote:
>
> > So, I had the wrong Nate, I'm still having to place everybody.
> > Did you NOT see Aldrich's interview?
>
> I didn't see the one your referring to. However I've heard him in other interviews where he even
> answered questions called in from some hostile listeners. He sounded credible to me.
>
> > He kept admitting that it was
> > all allegations, gossip--"matters that need to be further looked
> > into." He was not credible. Some of his "sources" were infuriated
> > that he would use their name in connection with his "reporting."
> > They said they talked with him over a glass of beer and admitted they
> > were just gossiping and had no idea the guy would use them in a book.
> > Aldrich guy backed down and made himself look like a fool and YOU STILL
> > BELIEVE HIM--Nateman, where is your logic!
> > check it out: http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm
>
> I went and checked this out. I believe Hilliary is lying when she said she didn't hire Livingston. Not
> only was the White house staff very evasive about who hired him but they ended up pinning the blame on
> a dead guy. (Poor Vince: He gets all the credit for the rotten things now that he is dead).Hillary is
> well known to have been involved with the hiring decisions for much of the White House.My logic is just
> fine. Take off your rose colored glasses and see these liars and socialists for the crooks they are!
>
> > He told Tim "allegations that need to be further looked into."
> > Whitewater, my goodness, the Republicans have spent $30 million
> > dollars to investigate that trailer court project. We could have
> > bought everybody in Arkansas a mobile home for that...but don't get
> > me started on government spending. . . the Republicans will drain the
> > treasury to go after Clinton.
> >
>
> Money well spent if it manages to get that nest of crooks out of power. I didn't like Jimmy Carter much
> but at least I believed he was a man of honor.The Nateman
>
>
> --------------A9C7A738261B4AB2D870CEA3
> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> <HTML>
> &nbsp;
>
> <P>chardin wrote:
> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>So, I had the wrong Nate, I'm still having to place
> everybody.
> <BR>Did you NOT see Aldrich's interview?</BLOCKQUOTE>
> I didn't see the one your referring to. However I've heard him in other
> interviews where he even answered questions called in from some hostile
> listeners. He sounded credible to me.
> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>He kept admitting that it was
> <BR>all allegations, gossip--"matters that need to be further looked
> <BR>into."&nbsp;&nbsp; He was not credible.&nbsp; Some of his "sources"
> were infuriated
> <BR>that he would use their name in connection with his "reporting."
> <BR>They said they talked with him over a glass of beer and admitted they
> <BR>were just gossiping and had no idea the guy would use them in a book.
> <BR>Aldrich guy backed down and made himself look like a fool and YOU STILL
> <BR>BELIEVE HIM--Nateman, where is your logic!
> <BR>check it out: <A HREF="http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm">http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm</A></BLOCKQUOTE>
> I went and checked this out. I believe Hilliary is lying when she said
> she didn't hire Livingston. Not only was the White house staff very evasive
> about who hired him but they ended up pinning the blame on a dead guy.
> (Poor Vince: He gets all the credit for the rotten things now that he is
> dead).Hillary is well known to have been involved with the hiring decisions
> for much of the White House.My logic is just fine. Take off your rose colored
> glasses and see these liars and socialists for the crooks they are!
> <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE><A HREF="http://www.htcomp.net/123/bgt_book.htm"></A>
>
> <P>He told Tim "allegations that need to be further looked into."
> <BR>Whitewater, my goodness, the Republicans have spent $30 million
> <BR>dollars to investigate that trailer court project.&nbsp; We could have
> <BR>bought everybody in Arkansas a mobile home for that...but don't get
> <BR>me started on government spending. . . the Republicans will drain the
> <BR>treasury to go after Clinton.
> <BR>&nbsp;</BLOCKQUOTE>
> Money well spent if it manages to get that nest of crooks out of power.
> I didn't like Jimmy Carter much but at least I believed he was a man of
> honor.The Nateman
> <BR>&nbsp;</HTML>
>
> --------------A9C7A738261B4AB2D870CEA3--
>
>