I enjoy a good debate and am especially interested in beliefs vs.
reality and "how we know what we know." Also, while I think the
scienifitic method is good, I feel that science and scientists have
become the new "religion" and priests of our age. Do you think I can find a
place to vent and exchange ideas on this site or am I way out in left
field? If I understand correctly, one does not have to be
a professional philosopher to partake in these discussions. Cathy Hardin
> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 1997 09:52:31 -0600
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> From: David McFadzean <david@kumo.com>
> Subject: virus: Logic
> Reply-to: virus@lucifer.com
> The MS Weapon thread has raised some important questions around the
> role of logic. Is it "just" a tool? What is its scope and limits?
> Do we need means outside of logic to determine when it is appropriate
> to use it? Can a logical argument say anything about reality, or is
> it (as one contributor put it recently) just "smoke and mirrors"?
> I have a few ideas, but I'd like to hear from others first.
>
> --
> David McFadzean david@kumo.com
> Memetic Engineer http://www.kumo.com/~david/
> Kumo Software Corp. http://www.kumo.com
>