RE: virus: Re: Social Metaphysics

Robin Faichney (r.j.faichney@stir.ac.uk)
Mon, 29 Sep 1997 10:29:01 +0100

> From: David McFadzean[SMTP:david@lucifer.com]
>
> At 01:12 PM 9/27/97 -0700, Tim Rhodes wrote:
> >
> >On Fri, 26 Sep 1997, David McFadzean wrote:
> >
> >> My mistake. I didn't mean that objective reality is consistent, I
> meant
> >> that true isosemantic[1] statements about objective reality are
> consistent.
> >
> >Very good, I can now agree with you without qualification!
>
> Wow, progress! Are there any dissenters, or can we start exploring the
> weird and wonderful territory entailed by the aforementioned
> conjecture?
>
Not only is it true that objective reality is consistent -- in fact
our objective reality is just the most consistent subjective reality
we can find. Consistency is all that distinguishes between
subjective and objective realities.

(Call that a conjecture, if you like.)

Robin