RE: virus: Re: Social Metaphysics

Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Fri, 26 Sep 1997 19:51:15 -0700

David McF. wrote:
>At 03:41 PM 9/26/97 -0700, Richard Brodie wrote:
>>All you've proved is that logic is consistent (a tautology). You've proved
nothing about reality.
>
>I have a few objections to your objection:
>
>1. It is not a tautology that logic is consistent.
>2. I wasn't talking about the consistency of logic.
>3. I didn't and wasn't trying to prove anything.
>4. Which 'reality' are you talking about?
>
>Let me rephrase to be more clear:
>
>Are true isosemantic statements about objective reality non-contradictory?
Yes or no?

Let me guess an MS Flip answer:

(1) Only within logic which has nothing to do with reality.
(2) This is not a Yes/No question.
(3) Everything is a metaphore.
(4) David, I want to get you out of Level-2 thinking.
(5) I can't really respond to this, since it's all based on a world view
that I don't share with you.

Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159