>BTW, I have to say, at the risk of reopening old
>wounds, that you seem to be generalising
>"objective" in exactly the way you generalise
>"rational", to the point where, it seems to me,
Imagine my frustration. Should I make up new words?
>these words lose their usefulness. I.e., in this
>case, "objectively real" in your mouth seems to
>mean no more than "real" in anyone else's.
That is hard to believe, since I tried to explain what
I meant by "objectively real" and there is no consensus
on what everyone else means by "real". How could they
be the same?
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/