>Agreed, but don't waffle away from the point. You cannot adopt an
>intentional stance towards a phenomena without making THE ASSUMPTION that
>the phenomena is willful. You can bury that leap of faith in as many
>layers of philosophical/scientistic double talk as makes you comfortable
I apologize for being dense but I really don't understand how making an
assumption *because* of good evidence is a "leap of faith".
>Perhaps. What is inconsistent about a belief in God?
Which God? Brodie's? The Christians'?
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/