already do.
> (and now that you've played my part, I play yours, right?)
>
>Yes, but people have been killing each other for dubious reasons for
>years... not only that, but the entire idea here is to *stop* the
>tobacco companies from killing people for the *dubious* benefit of
>making some money.
>
>So lets fight fire with fire.
Yeah, and lets count the net saving of lives as our motive.
>
>> Even a terminally ill person may have something to loose if
>> retaliation is made against those she leaves behind.
>
>Retaliation will merely *aid* the purpose, here. If the tobacco company
>retalitated, then the *sympathy* of the press will be *with* us, rather
>than against us. On thing we know for sure: the t.c. will not be
>interested in having *more* press on this issue. They will want less.
>A cover up, not a retaliation...
You are right, I never really thought this one through.
>> The world population is too high.
>
>So why don't you kill yourself?
I am going to, next time hailey's comet comes round I am on it.
Tony Hindle.