> Actually, I don't think such a game would last very long. The non rule
> bound person would win as soon as s/he chose to. "Check mate" This of
> course gets back to the fundamental critisim of Post-Structuralism and
> level 3. Why play by /any/ rules?
So you get invited back for another game. "Level 3" (and I just got your
book from the library this morning, Richard, and look forward to reading
it) doesn't mean making yourself impotent. It is rational (however you
wish to define it) to play by the rules enough to enable you to
communicate/inspire/relate to others while at the same time realizing that
your own self-imposed rules are up for grabs.
-Prof. Tim