<snip Dennett, self, Cartesian Theatre and dualism>
OK. We're back down to definitions again. I'm obviously using 'self' in
a looser manner to you. For the purposes of this discussion do a quick
mental search-and-replace and where I have said 'self' substitute 'the
biological entity under discussion'. Does that help?
>If you accept there's no real self, you can't consistently claim
>that a chain of causation could be traced back to it.
See above. 'Self-interest' becomes 'in the interest of the biological
entity'.
>>It also tells us that reflection alone *cannot* reveal our motives to
>>us. It also requires examination from an outside source.
>
>No, it just tells us introspection is not entirely reliable.
???...That's what I just said.
-- Martz martz@martz.demon.co.ukFor my public key, <mailto:m.traynor@ic.ac.uk> with 'Send public key' as subject an automated reply will follow.
No more random quotes.