RE: virus: Angelica de Meme

Wright, James 7929 (Jwright@phelpsd.com)
Fri, 04 Apr 97 08:36:00 EST


>Tony Hindle wrote:
<Snip backquote>
> Heres a thought. do the (increasingly precise) observations
>science makes help us by allowing us to formulate theories to explain
>what we see. Or are they just more data to explain?<
I see it as circularly endless. The data discovered lead to theories
which attempt to explain the data, which leads to a search for more data
to confirm / disprove the theories, endlessly and in all directions
simultaneously.

> What state would science be in if there was no radiation coming
>from anywhere in the skies except for the sun and the moon?<
Difficult to say; after all, radiotelescopes were invented, when no one
had ever seen the stars that they can depict. I hope that imagination
would have driven science in discovery even in the absence of easily
observable puzzles.
<Snip backquote>
>>The use of tune in puzzles me.<<
> I see objective reality as the omnipresent radio station, to
>which all creatures of the cosmos can Tune into, so we have something we
>can talk to one another about. Wow I love this quote Im putting it in a
>sig. file now.<
OK.
>> Does objective reality vary based on the perception of the subject?<<
> No. I see objective reality being translated by each subject
>into that subject's reality. (subjective reality, the first thing I ever
>learned from Tim was this distinction.)<
OK.
> I present this as my candidate new perspective. My writebyte to
>name it is my sig. file.<
>Tony Hindle.
> I see objective reality as the omnipresent radio station,
>to which all creatures of the cosmos can Tune into, so we have
>something in common that we can talk to one another about when we meet.
> ...The Reverend C. Darwin.<
We'll have to start working on the nominations for Prophet of the Year!
(VBG!)
Thanks!
james