Re: virus: Axioms
Tadeusz Niwinski (tad@teta.ai)
Thu, 20 Mar 1997 21:09:18 -0800
Tim wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Mar 1997, Tadeusz Niwinski wrote:
>> Human understanding is an axiom? Yes, we assume we are able to
>> understand.
>> In other words we are conscious of reality and capable of understanding it.
>
>That's not what I said, Tad. Human understanding doesn't have to have any
>connection with "reality." It may. Or it may not. But one does not
>necessitate the other. Remember, human understanding has human flaws that
>I hope you would not burden reality with possessing.
What did you mean in your axiom then: understanding of what ?
Regards, Tadeusz (Tad) Niwinski from planet TeTa
tad@teta.ai http://www.teta.ai (604) 985-4159