>>Yes. So what is your analysis using Level-3 or post-rational thinking? Is
>>it possible for David R.'s axioms to be neither mutually justifying nor
>>unjustified? If so, how? (I'm looking for more than your assertion here.)
>
>Of course it is. A Level-3 mind sees its memetic programming as
>a collection of different, possibly conflicting ways to map Objective
>Reality (if it chooses to use that distinction-meme).
>
>Possible, justifying, unjustified -- these are all distinction-memes.
Sure, but how does that show that David R.'s axioms can be neither
justified nor unjustified? Are you saying that they can be both,
or that they are neither if we dispense with the categories?
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/