But what of the Godel theorem? If there are statements that exist in
logic that cannot be proved true using logic, how shall you proceed?
>But to examine the relative worth of logic itself you have to go outside
>the system and see how it does compared to competitive systems in terms
>of survival, happiness, effectiveness, etc. (In case it isn't obvious,
>I think it does very well by those criteria.)
What competitive systems are there? How well do they do? Which criteria
would you use to decide?
I am not asking simply to "muddy the waters". If there is a competing
system that does not include logic, should it be included in the CofV, or
at least considered?
James Wright