>What I'm trying to convey, clumsily, is that `free will' is a misnomer;
>there /is/ no `free will,' there is no `will' even. There /is/
>interaction between your myriad memetic components, but its
>unpredictible and, for all intents and purposes, has `free will' via
>being too complex to predict.
Rather than denying the existence of free will, how would you change
the definition such that it could exist? I think it can be done, and
further, other people's statements about free will started making sense.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/