>Does knowledge of Christianity /really/ denote `infection'? If we're
>going to use the bio-viral model, what would the equivalent of `once
>infected, infection fought /off/ successfully and antibodies still
>present or natural immunity'? We may carry memes that make up passive
>/knowledge/ of Christianity, but does that really imply infection?
>
Let's remember the difference between labels, or distinction-memes, and
operating practices, or strategy-memes. It's possible to be infected
with all the Labels of Christianity but not DO it. Same with Level 3.
Richard Brodie RBrodie@brodietech.com +1.206.688.8600
CEO, Brodie Technology Group, Inc., Bellevue, WA USA
http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie
Do you know what a "meme" is? http://www.brodietech.com/rbrodie/meme.htm
>