> The easiest status game is to say No-- to everything.
I wouldn't call saying no to John saying no to everything.
> You also lie like a rug.
You mean like in an intentional deception? You are the liar...
unless you can prove that I am intentionally decieving?
> If you find memetics interesting then why do you try to convince people
> to ignore it. I usually ingore things I find UNinteresting.
I never try to convince people to ignore it. That is your misunderstanding.
> So why not give us the plain truth XYZ. What's up with you and memetics?
> I posted the opinion the memetics is a Scientific/aesthetic theory.
> Why can't you see he aesthetic applications of memetics, and the
> ridiculousness of asking people to prove that it exists?
Do UFO's exist? Does God exist? They can be beautiful but that depends
on what side of the fence you are on.
> Why don't you tell us about your favourite painting. Tell us what it
> means to you-- and then prove it means what it means to you.
If it is a science, then beauty has nothing to do with it. Science isn't
supposed to be art. Ever notice how pure logic is cold and unfeeling?
That is because it is supposed to be.