In my experience, that's is an incorrect assertion.
> No one has ever been
> high on THC while driving and killed someone because their judgement
> had been "suspended". On alcholhol? Yes. On pot? No.
I don't want to sound rude, but you make an awful lot of sweeping statistical
statements concerning the nature and effects of pot, with no seeming
basis to them. I refuse to believe that in the history of motoring, there
has *never* been an accident involving a death where a drugged driver
was the cause.
>
> > Until there is a test for drugged drivers, then there is enormous risk
> > in legalising/decriminalising Dope.
>
> There has never been any risk for pot.
AAAARRGH....
This is what we've been talking about. Unless you can give me conclusive
proof that there is *no* harmful effects of pot, then I cannot believe
that. Unfortunately, you claim that there have been no studys into the
long term effects, and the carcinogenic implications, so how can you
possibly know?
Drakir
--------------
Richard Jones
jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
--------------
"We are the New Breed,
We are the Future."
--------------