Re: virus: Pot

jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
Wed, 18 Dec 96 11:40:11 GMT


> You would have to pretend that someone smoking only pot would
> drive badly -- which drivers on pot do not do.

In my experience, that's is an incorrect assertion.

> No one has ever been
> high on THC while driving and killed someone because their judgement
> had been "suspended". On alcholhol? Yes. On pot? No.

I don't want to sound rude, but you make an awful lot of sweeping statistical
statements concerning the nature and effects of pot, with no seeming
basis to them. I refuse to believe that in the history of motoring, there
has *never* been an accident involving a death where a drugged driver
was the cause.

>
> > Until there is a test for drugged drivers, then there is enormous risk
> > in legalising/decriminalising Dope.
>
> There has never been any risk for pot.

AAAARRGH....

This is what we've been talking about. Unless you can give me conclusive
proof that there is *no* harmful effects of pot, then I cannot believe
that. Unfortunately, you claim that there have been no studys into the
long term effects, and the carcinogenic implications, so how can you
possibly know?

Drakir
--------------
Richard Jones
jonesr@gatwick.geco-prakla.slb.com
--------------
"We are the New Breed,
We are the Future."
--------------