> At 00:48 16/12/96 -0600, zaimoni (I'm sure I'll work out whether that's your
> full name, surname, or what, soon, but for now, excuse me) wrote:
> >On Mon, 16 Dec 1996, Dave Pape wrote:
[CLIP]
> >2) I would phrase it as the freedom-consciousness inequalities.
>
> Ah! Why? Are we talking Venn diagram overlaps here? Sorry, you're talking to
> someone who's only been FORGETTING maths for the last 10 years I'm afraid.
Yes, that's one context to interpret it in.
Actually, you don't seem to be forgetting it too fast; I'm interpreting
the inclusion relation as an underpowered "<". [It isn't always
defined, but it works properly otherwise....] The technical term
is "partially ordered set", or "poset".
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/ Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/ Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////