FW: Reply: RE: virus: Magic/Science

Schneider John (JSCHNEID@hanoverdirect.com)
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 01:44:23 -0500


============================================
| ... towards a crisper definition of |
| that which remains undefined ... |
| JPSchneider |
| jschneid@hanoverdirect.com |
============================================

>----------
>From: Haphaestus[SMTP:noctem@centuryinter.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 1996 11:02AM
>To: Schneider John
>Subject: Reply: RE: virus: Magic/Science
>
><snip>
>
>>Open question: is that a fundamentally wrong way of looking at it,
>>and if so, then is there any literature available which actually
>>shows the reader "how to do magic", and doesn't frog around with
>>discussing the "why" until afterword?
>>
>>
>>- JPS
>>- jschneid@hanoverdirect.com
>
> Chaos Magic (of the variety developed by Peter J. Carroll) takes
>this slant. Not unexpectedly, his form of C. M. is regarded with
>disdain by people outside of the groups that practice it, usually
>labeling it as black magic because of its emphasis on practicality
>instead of metaphysics.
>
> Regards,
> Haphaestus
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------
>Stygian Blacksmith Studios "Don't quote
>Crowley,
>
>tell me what you think."
>Editor, The Stygian Forge _Mage: The
>Ascension_
>http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/5380
>
>Send e-mail with "Cypher" as subject for PGP 2.6.2 public key.
>Personal posts will be killfiled unless they are sent encrypted.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-----------------------------------
>