OK, apology accepted. I still won't let you go with it, David. What's
wrong with "only way"? This is *his* book and the reader is aware of it.
He presents *his* view and *not* everybody else's. He is not saying "there
is another way of explaining seemingly designed objects in nature by the
existence of God the Designer" -- we know lots of people who "explain" them
this way. He is also not saying that if you assign a Simple Number to each
living creature you can explain the "seemingly designed objects" with
Cohesive Math (as some people "explain" the Christian Mass :-))! He
presents "the only way" from his point of view, based on his experience and
thinking.
The second part: "slow, gradual evolution". Would "fast" or "not gradual"
be better?
>I didn't call Dawkins an "idiot" just to be a smart-ass.
Here is a challenge for you, David: rephrase this sentence from the cover
flap of "Climbing Mount Improbable" the way you think a *non-idiot* author
would write it.
---------------------
Tad Niwinski from TeTa where people grow
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816
406286208998
Danger!!! Danger!!! DANGER!!!
The Level-3 Hypocrisy Virus (L3HV) is threatening YOU and your children!
PROTECT yourself: never talk to an infected person without a condom!