Re: virus: accurate statements vs The Absolute Truth (was KMO

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Tue, 05 Nov 1996 17:45:48 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David McFadzean: "Re: virus: TT and The Absolute Truth"
Previous message: Tadeusz Niwinski: "Re: virus: TT and The Absolute Truth"

At 11:59 AM 28/08/70 +0000, David Leeper wrote:
>If Absolute Truth is dependent upon Objective Reality, isn't Absolute
>Truth really Relative Truth, being true relative to Objective Reality?

Yes, even if it was possible to have an infinite number of true
statements about OR, it wouldn't be absolute because the truth
is a relation between the statement's meaning and objective reality.

Next message: David McFadzean: "Re: virus: TT and The Absolute Truth"
Previous message: Tadeusz Niwinski: "Re: virus: TT and The Absolute Truth"