I am trying to understand what you mean by:
"possibly conflicting ways to map Objective Reality".
On Mon, 28 Oct 1996 12:20:51 -0800 you wrote:
>I've just returned from a week of Level-1 activity in the Bahamas.
(BTW: I understand all four F's were there :-))
and on Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:04:06 -0800 you wrote:
>I just returned from a week in the Bahamas with some guys
>who are on the cutting edge of NLP Magick. Vague evocative
>statements are central to creating desired memes in others.
Do you consider meeting the "cutting edge NLP guys", who know how
to control others, a level-1 activity?!
Is this a good example of how a level-3 person (if she chooses to
use that distinction-meme) maps Objective Reality in conflicting
ways?
---------------------
Tad Niwinski from TeTa where people grow
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884
There is no Absolute Truth, although we are getting closer and closer to IT.