> 1 = cut & dried,
> 2 = can be eventually resolved by debate and
> 3 = total uncertainty.
Look how easily you've defined these. Why can't the same be
done with the so-called Level 1, 2 and 3 thinkers?
Anyone can define three levels. Here's an example:
Level 1: Replicators based on physics (Example: Stars).
Level 2: Replicators based on genes (Example: Dogs)
Level 3: Replicators based on memes (Example: Emotions)
How many postings, how many contradictory statements, how
much plain nonsense, must we endure before simply tossing
the idea and moving on to something productive?
-- David Leeper dleeper@gte.net Homo Deus http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/index.htm 1 + 1 != 2 http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/CMath.html