> On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, David Leeper wrote:
>
> > Richard Brodie,
> >
> > > On the contrary, I was very specific about why people don't appreciate
> > > the three levels. It's because they're in Level 2.
> >
> > Or perhaps it's because "Level 3" has been described so poorly. So far,
> > I've seen (paraphrasing) "Level 3 is high intelligence", "Level 3 is not
> > high inteligence, it's will power" and "Level 3 is not will power, it's
> > using resources efficently".
> >
> > Or perhaps it's the tone of benevolent condescension that seems to
> > accompany "Level 3" postings.
> >
> > Or perhaps it's because people who use terms like "Level 3" sound
> > like they play too much Dungeons & Dragons.
>
> I believe one of those paraphrases is describing a 15% accurate analogy.
> Don't get too much out of it....
Sorry, I didn't mean to insult people who play Dungeons & Dragons. ;->
-- David Leeper Homo Deus http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/index.htm