> Richard Brodie,
>
> > On the contrary, I was very specific about why people don't appreciate
> > the three levels. It's because they're in Level 2.
>
> Or perhaps it's because "Level 3" has been described so poorly. So far,
> I've seen (paraphrasing) "Level 3 is high intelligence", "Level 3 is not
> high inteligence, it's will power" and "Level 3 is not will power, it's
> using resources efficently".
>
> Or perhaps it's the tone of benevolent condescension that seems to
> accompany "Level 3" postings.
>
> Or perhaps it's because people who use terms like "Level 3" sound
> like they play too much Dungeons & Dragons.
> --
> David Leeper
> Homo Deus
> http://home1.gte.net/dleeper/index.htm
I believe one of those paraphrases is describing a 15% accurate analogy.
Don't get too much out of it....
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
/ Towards the conversion of data into information....
/
/ Kenneth Boyd
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////