Re: virus: level 3 minds

Vicki Rosenzweig (rosenzweig@hq.acm.org)
Fri, 18 Oct 96 13:17:00 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Vicki Rosenzweig: "RE: virus: Does the term "grok" means anything to you?"
Previous message: zaimoni@ksu.edu: "Re: virus: Re: level 3 minds"
Maybe in reply to: Tadeusz Niwinski: "virus: level 3 minds"
Next in thread: David McFadzean: "Re: virus: level 3 minds"

This may be hopelessly simplistic, but if (as Richard Brodie says),
"The Level-3 mind realizes that NO meme is True," isn't this mind
accepting the meme "There is no absolute truth"? In all seriousness,
this is the same problem I have with Robert Anton Wilson: it seems
to be absolutist claim that there are no absolutes. This means there
is at least one meme/belief that is still accepted as true. Related
to this, on what basis does such a mind decide that a meme is
useful? Where do its goals come from?

Vicki
rosenzweig@acm.org

Next message: Vicki Rosenzweig: "RE: virus: Does the term "grok" means anything to you?"
Previous message: zaimoni@ksu.edu: "Re: virus: Re: level 3 minds"
Maybe in reply to: Tadeusz Niwinski: "virus: level 3 minds"
Next in thread: David McFadzean: "Re: virus: level 3 minds"