Take care. -KMO
On Fri, 20 Sep 1996 10:11:25 +0000 Martin Traynor <m.traynor@ic.ac.uk>
writes:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On 19 Sep 96 at 11:32, Patricia & John Crooks wrote:
>
>> Am I being really nit-picking to say that I really wish you people
>would
>> stop tossing the word dogma around like it has no specific meaning?
>
>Apologies. My Concise Oxford defines dogma as
>1 a principle, tenet, or system of these esp. as laid down by
>authority of a church
>2 an arrogant declaraiton of opinion
>
>and you are quite correct. As we are speaking about religion then 1
>should apply. Replace the word with definition 2 where applicable ;)
>
>
>> >On another level, science as religious dogma is plain for all to
>see.
>> >Faith in its abilities abound, among people who don't necessarily
>> >even know or care what science is. I mean faith here in a very
>strict
>> >sense - belief without supporting evidence.
>>
>> Oooh, I see another nit.:-} I disagree with this as a definition of
>> religious faith.
>
>Faith:
>1 complete trust or confidence
>2 firm belief esp. without logical proof
>
>I was using 2 but I should have specified scientific evidence.
>
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: 2.6.2i
>Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.
>
>iQCVAwUBMkHvO15rBERarcK9AQH7iAP+JTtCKR1PqrMhVrFjnozziokwhDEO73na
>Q0qNu2FPqQSdowEB3u3IhnlOlTu/Qe7nTrWYsWV0JFjiNkf1fFjWg+mP+ujn29Ru
>Mx9QK5b97cCBfbh0Kc+zm9YVXMMymQWyZkHVC0y5ZzL0IwRFS2AzsCsdC5SLw0KZ
>uJoWhPsfTZw=
>=30nf
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>--
>Martz <m.traynor@ic.ac.uk>
>For my PGP key, email me with 'Send public key' as subject
>