On 18 Sep 96 at 7:35, Wade T. Smith wrote:
<snip>
> In what way, again, do you think the scientific investigation of the
> natural universe lacks the 'tools' necessary to answer these
> 'philosophical' questions you seem to think require supernatural
> implements?
'Supernatural' is only one subset of the disciplines which lie beyond
the realm of science so I can't respond to your question with that
last clause included. If I may redefine the question as 'in what way
do I think the scientific investigation of the natural universe lacks
the tools necessary to answer certain questions?' then I can attempt
to answer it. Is this acceptable?
Also, I've not been on this list for very long so if I stray into
areas which anyone considers off-topic let me know and the
conversation can always be continued elsewhere.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Requires PGP version 2.6 or later.
iQCVAwUBMj+Kxl5rBERarcK9AQEYZgP/UEMcpOevBqZOSYr2H7+J2DENGrUzI7k2
+PpguDvqx9blVTllNfwLv2YxdE+pnvDn6J1xIjqoZkSKV/4/WBCJ056wRNer1ecC
LhEReo4beKcNWsLKzKhqff3ADWlYF2q0WH4yzjzYGj3W+ZJVwD8I8G+HQHSe1CIr
L1/w5xz10ig=
=CqYR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- Martz <m.traynor@ic.ac.uk> For my PGP key, email me with 'Send public key' as subject