> > At the level that we view 'evolution' (your definition), I would say
> > that you are correct. However, as everyone I know will agree, recursion is
> > weird. Who is to say that our minds our at the bottom of the stack in
> > 'self-awareness'?
> >
> Our conscious minds are the tip of the iceberg that breaks the
> waterskin; we are unaware of most of our cognitive processing.
Agreed. But that still does not awnser my question. You are looking at what is on top of our 'conscious' minds (all the details, breath, motor control, depression), I'm curious to know what is below us on the stack. What our recursive minds are subproblems of.