From: BrettMan35@webtv.net (Brett Robertson) Date sent: Fri, 28 May 1999 03:18:02 -0500 (EST) To: virus@lucifer.com Subject: Re: virus: A "Confession" about "The Sign" Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com
> kjs,
>
> I find no evidence for subjectivity...
>
You being a particular person, this statement is self-contradictory
on its face. Rewind. Try Again.
>
> that is, beginning with a
> material universe, all events (actions and objects) MUST be defined
> objectively; and, with objective validity, what is true is true for ALL
> thinking animals regardless of the subjective slant they choose to put
> on it.
>
"Subjective slant?" Didn't you just deny the possibility of such a
thing? Hellyes, but that never stopped our intrepid Brettster before!
This all looks like some crazed pseudological quazijustification for
some form of Christianity to me...
>
> (there are no individually determined truths especially not ones which
> are different for different people...
>
My name is Joe Dees. This is true. Of course, it may be true that
different individuals may have different names...
>
>except that such might be
> coordinated by a larger truth whose interpretation is outside the bounds
> of individual [or group] say-so).
> ...
But individuals (and the social group at large) are the bestowers of
names; nature sure doesn't do it.
>
> I disagree that all are self-destructive. What is your evidence for
> such a statement? (besides, I said that I was not taught to make excuses
> for such behavior, not that it NEVER occurred).
>
So, Carter, who sinned in his heart, is just as guilty of adultery as
Clinton, who semened in Monica's mouth...I dinna think so.
>
> Brett Lane Robertson
> Indiana, USA
> http://www.window.to/mindrec
> MindRecreation Metaphysical Assn.
> BIO: http://members.theglobe.com/bretthay
> ...........
> Put your item up for auction! Bid on hot opportunities! Click HERE to
> view great deals!:
> http://www.utrade.com/index.htm?MID=59876
>
>