>Date: Sat, 27 Mar 1999 16:55:41 +0000
>From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: virus: BNW revisited
>
>In message <199903270153.UAA08253@websmtp1.bellsouth.bigfoot.com>, joe
>dees <joedees@bellsouth.net> writes
>>
>>I have earlier remarked that BNW was not the mature expression of Aldous
>>Huxley's utopian thought; that rather ISLAND was.
>
>I haven't been following this thread, but having noticed
>this sentence, I have to respond: the notion of Brave
>New World as a utopia is very strange. It is in fact the
>exact opposite: a distopia. Unlike Island, which
>certainly is utopian.
>- --
>Robin
Utopia: The place which is no place. Within the tradition of utopian literature there is a distinct ambivalence between the concepts of the pure good and pure evil. What is probably more true is that purity of any sort is an unattainable state and neurotic attempts at personal or societal purification are ultimately self-destructive. You can only shave so close before you're cutting your own arteries, as those little hairs are entangled with the vessels of our lifesblood.
As an analogy, Richard might refer to some things as "core needs". I might call them essential elements of consciousness. The reason that I'm a little ambivalent about Buddhism (and the derived vision in _Island_) is that...to be honest...I don't believe it. I can meditate myself into a state of nothingness but the moment I move <I> move. There is no Cartesian <I> seperate from my physical existence. I've spent a lot of time contemplating <stillness> and it isn't so attractive to <me>.
The MEDIUM is the MESSAGE.
That is why a flower is such a good analogy...it's always unfolding.
Reed
Reed Konsler konsler@ascat.harvard.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------