>Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 09:19:25 -0700
>From: David McFadzean <david@lucifer.com>
>Subject: Re: virus: Quid pro quo (caveat emptor)
>
>No, it does not depend on context. The only situation where every
>side is equal is the one where nothing matters AKA nihilism.
>The sides are not equal using every other set of criteria (an
>infinite number of possible contexts).
>>If I say "heads I win, tails you lose" what does it matter?
>
>That is the best description of Level 3 I have seen yet.
OK, we traded cheap shots. I accept that.
>I thought Level 3 was about consciously choosing one's memes
>but I was wrong. Level 3 means never having to admit you
>were wrong. Level 3 means if you disagree with anyone you
>can always simultaneously insult them and discount everything
>they say by putting them on a lower level. Level 3 means that
>if anyone shows an inconsistency in your ideas, you can hide
>behind rhetoric. Maybe this isn't what Richard had in mind
>when he invented Level 3 but this is what it has become.
Really? I think this is your perception of it, not mine.
Second, I'm not insulting anyone. I'm confronting them.
Third, I accept inconsistency in an upright way...I don't
need to hide behind anything. I use rhetoric as a tool, as
have you in making these negative and inappropriate
associations to Level 3
>I can certainly play your game. Do you think it will be fun?
Is it?
Reed
Reed Konsler konsler@ascat.harvard.edu ---------------------------------------------------------------------