Eric wrote:
>Reed wrote:
>>But now it's confusing enough that you have to read it a few
>>times. It depends upon the resolution of your analysis.
>
>Well crappppppppy. :-). Perhaps I can phrase it better:
>
>Maybe not. I've tried a few rephrasings, but none of them are
>noticably better and still contain the modification I argued for.
"All communication is equivication."
-Prof. Tim