Re: virus: Faith and Reason

David McFadzean (david@lucifer.com)
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:18:42 -0700

At 11:49 AM 3/10/99 -0800, Tim Rhodes wrote:
>David McFadzean wrote:
>
>>>If you want, we could rule out fallacies as invalid moves if and
>>>when they come up. I just wanted to let you know in advance that
>>>I'm unlikely to accept any of the standard logical fallacies.
>
>Did you mean "on" rather than "out" above?

No, I meant "out" as in by the time we have identified a pattern as a fallacy we can call it an invalid move. All fallacies are invalid, but not all apparent fallacies are actually fallacies upon closer examination (perhaps).

--
David McFadzean                 david@lucifer.com
Memetic Engineer                http://www.lucifer.com/~david/
Church of Virus                 http://www.lucifer.com/virus/