Re:virus: Is this YOUR science?

joe dees (
Sun, 21 Feb 1999 04:56:42 -0500

At Sun, 21 Feb 1999 01:49:40 -0800, you wrote:
>Joe wrote:
>><<[..]; to falsify the syllogism, the onus is
>>on you to provide a disproving counterexample to the conditional!>>
>Interesting science you practice, there. You get to make claims, but don't
>have to prove them. Rather, it's up to others to disprove your claims.
>Doesn't sound at all like any science I've ever heard of. Sounds more
>..a Faith.

>-Prof. Tim

You'll never get away with that blatant inversion. You state that there is such a thing as a statement which is neither true nor false nor meaningless. I reply, show me one. That's just like you insisting that there's a god somewhere and me replying, "Show me this God of which you so glowingly speak." And you have the temerity and gall to accuse ME of being the faith-filled one, when it is YOU who has affirmed your belief in the existence of something you cannot demonstrate? Pleeeze! Joe E. Dees
Poet, Pagan, Philosopher

Access your e-mail anywhere, at any time. Get your FREE BellSouth Web Mail account today!